Thanks Scott.
That opens up some interesting possibilities for managing the development of
the app going forward.
As you say, shame Apple sets such a sloppy example.
Peter
On 10 Jul 2013, at 16:04, Scott Ribe <scott_r...@elevated-dev.com> wrote:
> On Jul 10, 2013, at 8:58 AM, Peter Hudson wrote:
>
>> Bearing in mind that we do not sell on the app store ( and its unlikely we
>> ever will ) does anyone know the rationale behind the
>> documented way of specifying the directory name and the obvious disparity
>> with real life ?
>
> No. Maybe a holdover from the days before bundles and bundle identifiers???
>
>> Is there a good reason for the documented way of doing this ?
>
> Well, I think so. App names can be localized, can be changed by the user,
> might even be changed by the publisher ("pro 3.0"), can be subject to
> conflict from dummies who put an app out without checking to see if the name
> is already used... But bundle identifiers in theory stay the same, and if
> specified properly are unique, and can always correspond to the app no matter
> what you or anyone else does to the app's name.
>
> Too bad *APPLE* chooses to set such a sloppy example...
>
> --
> Scott Ribe
> scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
> http://www.elevated-dev.com/
> (303) 722-0567 voice
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
