On 21 Jan 2014, at 21:24, Jerry Krinock <je...@ieee.org> wrote: > > On 2014 Jan 21, at 09:02, Mike Abdullah <mabdul...@karelia.com> wrote: > >> If it helps, I maintain https://github.com/karelia/BSManagedDocument as a >> nice way to have a package-based document using Core Data. > > Thank you, Mike. Now I have two reasons to start using BSManagedDocument :) > > Also, I have now confirmed the bug with a sample project and filed it, see > below.
Thanks Jerry. Sadly yes, some sort of migration would be required if you weren’t using a package-based format to start with (if you were, there’s a decent variety of hooks available in BSManagedDocument to customise it to match your existing layout). Presently BSManagedDocument is set up to configure Core Data to use the old-style journal (as I still support 10.6). However, the more I read on the subject, the more I wonder if this is worth it. Since the actual persistent store is kept safely hidden from the user inside of the package, is there actually any harm in using the new style journal, does anybody know? _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
