On Jan 25, 2014, at 2:23 PM, Mike Abdullah <mabdul...@karelia.com> wrote:
> Presently BSManagedDocument is set up to configure Core Data to use the > old-style journal (as I still support 10.6). However, the more I read on the > subject, the more I wonder if this is worth it. Since the actual persistent > store is kept safely hidden from the user inside of the package, is there > actually any harm in using the new style journal, does anybody know? Migration may fail as the WAL file for the old store isn't removed before attempting to open the new, migrated store -- which doesn't match the old store's WAL file... -- Glenn L. Austin, Computer Wizard and Race Car Driver <>< <http://www.austin-soft.com> _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
