On Jan 27, 2015, at 11:06 , Richard Charles <rcharles...@gmail.com> wrote: > > That is a key-value coding method.
It’s not, as Kyle just said. FWIW, there is yet another way to get to backing store from a custom primitive accessor — define another, private, Core Data property, and use *its* primitive accessors. This may seem clunky, but it’s officially countenanced in the Core Data Programming Guide, in the "Non-Standard Persistent Attributes” section. One advantage of this approach is that you can be sure there are no KVO observers of the private property, so you can gleefully ignore KVO compliance issues when doing housekeeping on the backing store value. Whether this makes Core Data undo easier or harder is one of those things that I’m doomed never to find out. _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
