On April 30, 2002, Fabien wrote:
> <mode type="hardheaded"> > > imHo, the difference is that people working on Cocoon enjoy coding, and > have > fun working un such an interesting "best-practicised" projet, with such > valuable people. > If people here enjoyed working with newbies to produce interesting doc, > they'd love your process, but I'm afraid Cocoon's doc are only written > because we HAVE TO write doc if the cod to be usefull, and that make a > BIG > difference. > > </mode> Good point. Seems we need a process that's flexible enough to work with any kind of author, regardless of their motivation. So, why don't we offer, on an entirely *optional* basis, editorial/SME feedback to authors who want it. That way, it's not an obstacle to authors who don't need or want it, but it can provide a boost to those who would like a more input before they commit. > BTW, if i'm wrong and if there are people willing to write doc only for > fun > (or glory), I think your process is OK. You could be right. And my process assumes there will be plenty of volunteer authors, coming from the users list, eager to participate. That's a big assumption. Even if it's true, it won't happen overnight. Thanks. Diana --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
