Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> >Good point. In that case, we might add another flag to the block
> >descriptor to indicate whether or not the sitemap should be mounted on a
> >URI space available to the outside.
> >
>
> An additional question related to external mount points : how do your
> envision them to be defined ? Will it like in web.xml or through a sitemap?
Since I consider this an implementation detail, I haven't thought about
it yet.
> I reused the current syntax for calling resources, but another one can
> be used. The important issue here is that we can have a pipeline defined
> across several sitemaps or blocks, which isn't possible today.
Correct. I'll be addressing the semantic problems I see in the current
sitemap shortly in another RT.
> Ok. I understand your concerns. So what about, for this particular case,
> having 3 skins : a "super-skin" that's the one used by other blocks,
> that dispatches to concrete skins depending on the environment ?
Hmmm, define "dispatches" before I can answer.
--
Stefano Mazzocchi One must still have chaos in oneself to be
able to give birth to a dancing star.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Friedrich Nietzsche
--------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
