On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 03:04:59PM +0200, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>
> > My question for you guys is whether you want me to force you to change
> > your interface for Resettable, or to have MPool work by reflection and
> > discover if there is a reset() method with public access. If that is
> > the case, then MPool would be able to call it--whether there was an
> > interface or not. I think the latter would be preferable, as it is
> > much more flexible--I just need to make it explicit that is what is
> > happening.
> >
>
> We need a way to invoke the recycle() method in the current implementations,
> so a support for Recyclable is required.
This could be done with an Accessor lifecycle extension.
Cheers,
Marcus
--
.....
,,$$$$$$$$$, Marcus Crafter
;$' '$$$$: Computer Systems Engineer
$: $$$$: ManageSoft GmbH
$ o_)$$$: 82-84 Mainzer Landstrasse
;$, _/\ &&:' 60327 Frankfurt Germany
' /( &&&
\_&&&&'
&&&&.
&&&&&&&:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
