On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 03:23:54PM +0100, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > Michael Melhem wrote: > > I recall suggesting map:pipe in an earlier discussion because it > > would confirm to "noun-verb" convention that already exists in > > the sitemap. > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=103642811405234&w=2 > > > > However, there the issue of "backwards compatibly" as Torsten points > > out. > > > Okay, we *could* (don't know right now if it's good) deprecate > the 2.0.x map:pipelines and map:pipeline and allow for a transition > period both versions for defining pipelines: map:pipeline and > map:pipe. > And the in 2.1 newly introduced components are then map:pipelines > resp. map:pipeline. > At least this would be consistent. > > What do you think?
Having noun-verb consistency in the sitemap would be nice. It would be a substantial name change, but I dont see a major problem with it as long both naming conventions are supported for a while as you suggest. I dont know what others think though. Regards, Michael > > Carsten > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
