Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > > >>map:generator Generator.java generate > >>map:transformer Transformer.java transform > >>... ... ... > >>map:pipe Pipeline.java pipeline > > > > > > Is this a real problem? I've never thought about such relationship. > > Anybody else? > > Well, if somebody thinks it is a problem we can change the java > classname with much less user pain. > The classes and interfaces are new for 2.1, so changing them is absolutely painless.
Having a weekend for thinking about the naming problem, I think Stefano is right, that map:pipe (= a verb) is not a good choice to use for the pipelines section (= the section where pipelines are defined). So, I agree (now) that we should rename the components section from map:pipeline to map:pipe. Anyone against this? If not I can rename them tomorrow. Carsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
