On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 10:21:36AM -0500, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
> Michael Melhem wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 09:48:15AM -0500, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Michael Melhem wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>I recall suggesting map:pipe in an earlier discussion because it
> >>>>would confirm to "noun-verb" convention that already exists in
> >>>>the sitemap.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>... the only problem being that also pipe is a noun, it does not mean
> >>"somebody who makes pipelines". Currently, generator is "somebody who
> >>generates", transformer is "somebody who transforms", etc.
> >>
> >>But "pipe" noun does not describe an actor, "pipe" is passive... "Piper"
> >>could be better but it means "somebody who plays pipe"...
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Yes generally "pipe" is a noun...but how about "to pipe something through"
> >in this context it would be a verb ....
> >
>
> ... this will result in "pipe" (n) - "pipe" (v) pair ... we made a circle :)
>
> So, options for the pair are:
>
> pipeline - pipeline (existing)
> pipe - pipeline
> pipeline - pipe
> processor - process
> piper - pipe
> ...
>
> Other suggestions?
I was actually thinking:
<components>
<map:matchers>
</map:matchers>
<map:pipelines>
<map:pipeline/>
</map:pipelines>
</components>
..
<map:pipes>
<map:pipe>
<map:act>
<map:match>
...
</map:pipe>
<map:pipe>
</map:pipe>
</map:pipes>
thats my suggestion anyway :)
Regards,
Michael
>
>
> Vadim
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
