Lauren,

If you don't have a requirement for JDK1.4 I would recommend to stick
with JDK1.3.1 and Tomcat 4.0.4 (now in beta; or Tomcat 4.0.1) - they are
key ingredients for the-most-easiest-way-to-install-Cocoon meal.

Vadim

> From: Lauren Commons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> 
> I'm installing cocoon 2.0.2 on a redhat 7.2 server
> with Sun's JDK 1.4, and the lates Tomcat (the lite
> version, with out the jars now supplied by the JDK).
> 
> FIRST, I installed the binary version, copied Xerces,
> xalan ans xml-apis and I also replaced the javac.jar
> as specified in the install instructions.
> When I browse to the cocoon url I get an error
> compiling sitemap: NoClassDefFound:
> org/w3c/dom/ranges/DocumentRange
> 
> THEN, Thinking this might be a jdk compatability
> issue, I tried building from source.  When I do that I
> get 24 errors all related to EsqlConnection and
> EsqlConnectionCocoon2, which extend
> java.sql.Connection.
> 
> Question 1: What really caused the first problem?
> Question 2:  If I need to compile, what's up with the
> sql classes?
> I'm sure this has been asked before, but I can't check
> the archive....
> 
> tia
> 
> =====
> -------------------------
> Mr Lauren Commons
> DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed
> ARE in fact those of my employer.
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more
> http://games.yahoo.com/
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Please check that your question has not already been answered in the
> FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html>
> 
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please check that your question has not already been answered in the
FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html>

To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to