We do have a Code of Conduct: https://github.com/code4lib/antiharassment-policy/blob/master/code_of_conduct.md
So possibly something that reinforces that would be useful. -----Original Message----- From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG] On Behalf Of Patrick Murray-John Sent: Monday, November 14, 2016 4:14 PM To: CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Post-election statement affirming diversity from Code4Lib? I'm very much a reader/lurker on this list, so I don't know much about the bigger structures. I'm very much in favor of a statement along these lines. My question is about the teeth to it. When we look to who it will come from, do they have the ability to kick offenders off the list, or some other mechanism of response? Action seems to be needed now, and so in addition to a statement, I'd like to see behavior contrary to the statement having visible consequences. I think that'd add significance to whatever statement appears. Patrick Murray-John On 11/14/2016 06:00 PM, Tara Wood wrote: > Absolutely! > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Salazar, Christina < > christina.sala...@csuci.edu> wrote: > >> So can we see the samples - LITA's and NMRT's? And I'm also wondering >> who will be responsible for sending it out (i.e., who will it "come >> from") - C4L's "organization" being such that it is. >> Christina Salazar >> Broome Library >> CSU Channel Islands >> (PS I live in California where our Senate President Pro Tem and >> Assembly Speaker made a statement in regards to the US's current >> political situation, and their statement kept me personally from >> TOTALLY losing it. I believe a statement will make clear what >> otherwise might be an unknown for >> some.) >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG] On Behalf >> Of Kim, Bohyun >> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2016 1:05 PM >> To: CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG >> Subject: [CODE4LIB] Post-election statement affirming diversity from >> Code4Lib? >> >> Hi Code4Libbers, >> >> What do you think about issuing a post-election statement on >> diversity basically affirming that we stand by it? >> >> If that _IS_ the majority opinion in Code4Lib which I am _POSITIVE_ >> that it is, then I want to hear it and I think others may well! >> >> I just drafted one for LITA (to be out tomorrow hopefully). So I have >> some wordings that I can offer as a starting point. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> Thanks, >> Bohyun >> >> >
