Great, I will submit a pull request later today with a starting doc with some wording that we can collectively edit and develop with the reference to our CoC - definitely a good starting point!
Thanks, Bohyun > On Nov 15, 2016, at 10:35 AM, Richmond,Ian <i...@drexel.edu> wrote: > > The Code of Conduct seems to have a lot of teeth expressly covers who can > help and sanction, and includes many levels of escalation. Though much of it > is oriented to a conference setting, I think it would be a good base to > reinforce. Maybe some words about it and a link to the policy? > > --Ian Richmond > > -----Original Message----- > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG] On Behalf Of > Collier, Aaron > Sent: Monday, November 14, 2016 7:34 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Post-election statement affirming diversity from > Code4Lib? > > We do have a Code of Conduct: > https://github.com/code4lib/antiharassment-policy/blob/master/code_of_conduct.md > > > So possibly something that reinforces that would be useful. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG] On Behalf Of > Patrick Murray-John > Sent: Monday, November 14, 2016 4:14 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Post-election statement affirming diversity from > Code4Lib? > > I'm very much a reader/lurker on this list, so I don't know much about the > bigger structures. > > I'm very much in favor of a statement along these lines. > > My question is about the teeth to it. When we look to who it will come from, > do they have the ability to kick offenders off the list, or some other > mechanism of response? Action seems to be needed now, and so in addition to a > statement, I'd like to see behavior contrary to the statement having visible > consequences. I think that'd add significance to whatever statement appears. > > Patrick Murray-John > >> On 11/14/2016 06:00 PM, Tara Wood wrote: >> Absolutely! >> >> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Salazar, Christina < >> christina.sala...@csuci.edu> wrote: >> >>> So can we see the samples - LITA's and NMRT's? And I'm also wondering >>> who will be responsible for sending it out (i.e., who will it "come >>> from") - C4L's "organization" being such that it is. >>> Christina Salazar >>> Broome Library >>> CSU Channel Islands >>> (PS I live in California where our Senate President Pro Tem and >>> Assembly Speaker made a statement in regards to the US's current >>> political situation, and their statement kept me personally from >>> TOTALLY losing it. I believe a statement will make clear what >>> otherwise might be an unknown for >>> some.) >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG] On Behalf >>> Of Kim, Bohyun >>> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2016 1:05 PM >>> To: CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG >>> Subject: [CODE4LIB] Post-election statement affirming diversity from >>> Code4Lib? >>> >>> Hi Code4Libbers, >>> >>> What do you think about issuing a post-election statement on >>> diversity basically affirming that we stand by it? >>> >>> If that _IS_ the majority opinion in Code4Lib which I am _POSITIVE_ >>> that it is, then I want to hear it and I think others may well! >>> >>> I just drafted one for LITA (to be out tomorrow hopefully). So I have >>> some wordings that I can offer as a starting point. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Bohyun >>> >>> >>
