Lucy Holman, Director of the U Baltimore Library, and a former colleague of 
mine at UMBC,  got back to me about this.  Her reply puts this particular 
document into context.   It is an interesting reminder that not everything you 
find on the web is as it seems, and it certainly is not necessarily the final 
word.   We gotta go buy the book! 
Lucy is off-list, but asked me to post this on her behalf.  
Her contact information is below, though.... 

Very interesting discussion This issue of what is right and feasible in 
discovery services and how to configure it is important stuff for many of our 
libraries and we should be able to build on the findings and experiences of 
others rather than re-inventing the wheel locally....   (We use Summon) 

- Jonathan LeBreton


------------------------  begin Lucy's explanation  --------------

The full study and analysis are included in Chapter 14 of a new book, Planning 
and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries, Mary P. Popp 
and Diane Dallis (Eds).
 
The project was part of a graduate Research Methods course in the University of 
Baltimore's MS in Interaction Design and Information Architecture program.  
Originally groups within the course conducted task-based usability tests on 
EDS, Primo, Summon and Encore.  Unfortunately, the test environment of Encore 
led to many usability issues that we believed were more a result of the test 
environment than the product itself; therefore we did not report on Encore in 
the final analysis.  The study (and chapter) does offers findings on the other 
three discovery tools.  
 
There were six student groups in the course; each group studied two tools with 
the same user population (undergrad, graduate and faculty) so that each tool 
was compared against the other three with each user population overall.  The 
.pdf that you found was the final report of one of those six groups, so it only 
addresses two of the four tools.  The chapter is the only document that pulls 
the six portions of the study together.
 
I would be happy to discuss this with any of you individually if you need more 
information.
 
Thanks for your interest in the study.
 
 
Lucy Holman, DCD
Director, Langsdale Library
University of Baltimore
1420 Maryland Avenue
Baltimore, MD  21201
410-837-4333

-------------------------  end insert --------------------

Jonathan LeBreton 
Sr. Associate University Librarian
Temple University Libraries
Paley M138,  1210 Polett Walk, Philadelphia PA 19122
voice: 215-204-8231
fax: 215-204-5201
mobile: 215-284-5070
email:  lebre...@temple.edu
email:  jonat...@temple.edu


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of
> karim boughida
> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 5:09 PM
> To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] U of Baltimore, Final Usability Report, link 
> resolvers --
> MIA?
> 
> Hi Tom,
> Top players are EDS, Primo and Summon....the only reason I see encore in the
> mix is if you have other III products which is not the case of Ubalt library. 
> They
> have now worldcat? Encore vs Summon is an easy win for summon.
> 
> Let's wait for Jonathan LeBreton (Thanks BTW).
> 
> Karim Boughida
> 
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Tom Pasley <tom.pas...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Yes, I'm curious to know too! Due to database/resource matching or
> > coverage perhaps (anyone's guess).
> >
> > Tom
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 7:50 AM, karim boughida <kbough...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi All,
> >> Initially EDS, Primo, Summon, and Encore were considered but only
> >> Encore and Summon were tested. Do we know why?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Karim Boughida
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Jonathan Rochkind <rochk...@jhu.edu>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi helpful code4lib community, at one point there was a report online at:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> http://student-iat.ubalt.edu/students/kerber_n/idia642/Final_Usabilit
> >> y_Report.pdf
> >> >
> >> > David Walker tells me the report at that location included findings
> >> > about SFX and/or other link resolvers.
> >> >
> >> > I'm really interested in reading it. But it's gone from that
> >> > location,
> >> and
> >> > I'm not sure if it's somewhere else (I don't have a title/author to
> >> search
> >> > for other than that URL, which is not in google cache or internet
> >> archive).
> >> >
> >> > Is anyone reading this familiar with the report? Perhaps one of the
> >> authors
> >> > is reading this, or someone reading it knows one of the authors and
> >> > can
> >> be
> >> > put me in touch?  Or knows someone likely in the relevant dept at
> >> > ubalt
> >> and
> >> > can be put me in touch? Or has any other information about this
> >> > report or ways to get it?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks!
> >> >
> >> > Jonathan
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Karim B Boughida
> >> kbough...@gmail.com
> >> kbough...@library.gwu.edu
> >>
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Karim B Boughida
> kbough...@gmail.com
> kbough...@library.gwu.edu

Reply via email to