If it's too burdensome for the livestream crew, I'd be happy to
volunteer to work with the program committee and streaming committee to
make it happen.
I'd be willing to adapt the plain English consent sheet we used for
Access and the International Evergreen conference. I think it's
important for communication to be clear about where the video will be
streamed and archived. As a presenter I'm definately more mindful about
what I'm saying if I know it's going to be published to the web.
I think informed consent is important.
Tara
On 26/01/2015 12:00 PM, Cary Gordon wrote:
I think that requiring explicit permission from presenters is overly burdensome
for the crew that is struggling to get the recordings up. I think that speakers
and presenters should be informed that all presentations may be recorded and
made available to the public unless they inform the conference committee that
they do not want to be recorded before their presentation begins.
If they object, the video crew will refrain from capturing their presentation.
If we do screen capture again, it is possible that presenter could have the
option of allowing us to record their voice and screen.
Cary
On Jan 26, 2015, at 10:58 AM, Andreas Orphanides <[email protected]> wrote:
We would definitely want to both give notice to the presenters that the
plan is to record and to get consent (or dissent) ahead of time, so that we
can plan AV appropriately if someone does not want to be broadcast. It
would be awful to broadcast someone who didn't consent to it; nor would we
want to have to disrupt things in progress to adjust for an "unexpected"
dissent that should/could have been expected.
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Tara Robertson <[email protected]>
wrote:
I love this conversation.
WRT presenters, I think it's good to be explicit that the plan is to
stream and record. It would be good practice to have presenters sign a
consent form agreeing to this.
Tara
On 26/01/2015 10:42 AM, Andreas Orphanides wrote:
Sounds like we've got an established practice in place, then. Awesome.
Wouldn't hurt for us to clarify any policy we decide on to state that
presenters are welcome to not consent to webcast.
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:41 PM, William Denton <[email protected]> wrote:
On 26 January 2015, Andreas Orphanides wrote:
Not to complicate things: shall (or *how shall*) we accommodate
requests
from presenters who might have a "no photo" preference vis-a-vis
conference
webcast?
A few years ago a speaker didn't want to be filmed, and someone turned
off
the camera and put a paper bag over it for the duration.
Bill
--
William Denton ↔ Toronto, Canada ↔ https://www.miskatonic.org/
--
Tara Robertson
Accessibility Librarian, CAPER-BC <http://caperbc.ca/>
T 604.323.5254
F 604.323.5954
[email protected] <mailto:Tara%20Robertson%20%
[email protected]%3E>
Langara. <http://www.langara.bc.ca>
100 West 49th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Y 2Z6
--
Tara Robertson
Accessibility Librarian, CAPER-BC <http://caperbc.ca/>
T 604.323.5254
F 604.323.5954
[email protected]
<mailto:tara%20robertson%20%[email protected]%3E>
Langara. <http://www.langara.bc.ca>
100 West 49th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Y 2Z6
