I will not be there this year (coincided with a scholarship opportunity) , but 
I think the best option may be to establish a time frame where the conf will 
not be streamed (eg day 2 afternoon) that way we can say this group of 
presenters will not be filmed.
//Riley

Sent from my Windows Phone

--
Riley Childs
Senior
Charlotte United Christian Academy
Library Services Administrator
IT Services Administrator
(704) 537-0331x101
(704) 497-2086
rileychilds.net
@rowdychildren
I use Lync (select External Contact on any XMPP chat client)

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This email and any files transmitted with it are the 
property of Charlotte United Christian Academy.  This e-mail, and any 
attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein 
and may contain confidential information that is privileged and/or exempt from 
disclosure under applicable law.  If you are not one of the named original 
recipients or have received this e-mail in error, please permanently delete the 
original and any copy of any e-mail and any printout thereof. Thank you for 
your compliance.  This email is also subject to copyright. No part of it nor 
any attachments may be reproduced, adapted, forwarded or transmitted without 
the written consent of the copyright [email protected]

________________________________
From: Salazar, Christina<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: ‎1/‎26/‎2015 4:44 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy

In order to keep some presenters from being streamed and others not would 
require the presentation line up (including whether ALL of the presenters who 
are included on an individual presentation) to be made available to the filming 
crew in advance, for that line up not to change (for example, to run behind 
schedule), it would require quite a bit of babysitting of the "piece of paper" 
to make sure it was to hand at the time it's needed... I'm sure there's more 
that I don't know.

Because the broadcast is live, it's really NOT as simple as sticking up a piece 
of paper when someone comes on who doesn't want to be filmed because ONCE 
you've inadvertently filmed someone the cat is out of the bag - their image is 
out there for the world to see - it requires a bit of planning and thought (as 
I imagine) before the person is standing there getting filmed.

Cary and Riley (others) film C4L for fun and for free and may (????) want to 
actually do stuff other than juggling pieces of paper (like take a restroom 
break, perhaps?).

I believe Cary's and Riley's assessment that this is burdensome cos I can just 
imagine how this would be if *I* had to do it. Both have way more experience 
with this than me (er... I have none), but still, as I understand it, this is 
more than they feel comfortable taking on.

(Haven't you watched them - they actually DO bring some production values to 
this, too.)

Christina Salazar
Systems Librarian
John Spoor Broome Library
California State University, Channel Islands
805/437-3198


-----Original Message-----
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sarah 
Shealy
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 12:07 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy

What more would be required than just putting a sheet of paper in front of the 
lens while filming? Honestly curious.
Sarah

> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:00:05 -0800
> From: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
> To: [email protected]
>
> I think that requiring explicit permission from presenters is overly 
> burdensome for the crew that is struggling to get the recordings up. I think 
> that speakers and presenters should be informed that all presentations may be 
> recorded and made available to the public unless they inform the conference 
> committee that they do not want to be recorded before their presentation 
> begins.
>
> If they object, the video crew will refrain from capturing their presentation.
>
> If we do screen capture again, it is possible that presenter could have the 
> option of allowing us to record their voice and screen.
>
> Cary
>
> > On Jan 26, 2015, at 10:58 AM, Andreas Orphanides <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > We would definitely want to both give notice to the presenters that
> > the plan is to record and to get consent (or dissent) ahead of time,
> > so that we can plan AV appropriately if someone does not want to be
> > broadcast. It would be awful to broadcast someone who didn't consent
> > to it; nor would we want to have to disrupt things in progress to adjust 
> > for an "unexpected"
> > dissent that should/could have been expected.
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Tara Robertson
> > <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I love this conversation.
> >>
> >> WRT presenters, I think it's good to be explicit that the plan is
> >> to stream and record. It would be good practice to have presenters
> >> sign a consent form agreeing to this.
> >>
> >> Tara
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 26/01/2015 10:42 AM, Andreas Orphanides wrote:
> >>
> >>> Sounds like we've got an established practice in place, then. Awesome.
> >>>
> >>> Wouldn't hurt for us to clarify any policy we decide on to state
> >>> that presenters are welcome to not consent to webcast.
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:41 PM, William Denton <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 26 January 2015, Andreas Orphanides wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>  Not to complicate things: shall (or *how shall*) we accommodate
> >>>> requests
> >>>>
> >>>>> from presenters who might have a "no photo" preference vis-a-vis
> >>>>> conference webcast?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> A few years ago a speaker didn't want to be filmed, and someone
> >>>>> turned
> >>>> off
> >>>> the camera and put a paper bag over it for the duration.
> >>>>
> >>>> Bill
> >>>> --
> >>>> William Denton ↔  Toronto, Canada ↔  https://www.miskatonic.org/
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Tara Robertson
> >>
> >> Accessibility Librarian, CAPER-BC <http://caperbc.ca/> T
> >> 604.323.5254 F  604.323.5954 [email protected]
> >> <mailto:Tara%20Robertson%20% [email protected]%3E>
> >>
> >> Langara. <http://www.langara.bc.ca>
> >>
> >> 100 West 49th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Y 2Z6
> >>

Reply via email to