Thats a point.. they could checksum the topic and force a comparison or
something.. I dunno i aint a coder and i aint that versant with the
processor/bandwidth required to do as Im suggesting...
But I do see your point, it could be a significant hit. I guess topics
arent high prority. :)
-- BlakJak.
([EMAIL PROTECTED] - Work)
([EMAIL PROTECTED] - home)
At 21:39 14/08/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>from what i recall hearing the main reason that's not in the code is the
>bandwidth factor, think of how much it takes just for the net.burst of all
>the nicks, and channels they're in and what not....just think how much more
>it would take to put the topic for every channel in that too.
>
>correct me if i'm wrong...this is what i remember hearing.
>
>-Dawg/Brian Steil
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Foster
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 8:50 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [Coder-Com] Probably a dumb question...
> >
> >
> > But is there any way to get the servers to compare eachothers topics and
> > refresh them if one is missing on net.burst?
> >
> > You must have noticed that the topics quite often are seen on one server
> > and not another after netsplits..
> >
> > ?
> >
