I don't think X is an issue here Mark. =) Larry
"Yeah well BEAM this up *PAL*!" ----- Original Message ----- From: Mark Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 12:27 pm Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] little bug ? > I think the point here is that you cant remove the specific ban in > X based > on mask, without removing any other ban set in X which masks that > ban ... > > On the old X you could, with this version of X you can often > easily remove > other bans that you might want to leave behind eg: > > *!~[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > would be removed if someone set - and then removed - *!~*@* > > With the old X, you could unban just the *!~*@* listing, eg remove > that ban > from X, without the other existing bans being touched. > > > or to put it another way, someone banning and then removing the > ban for > *!*@* *in X* would cause ALL bans listed in X (at or below the > users access > level) to be removed. Shouldnt be the case. > > > At 01:18 11/12/01 +0100, you wrote: > >At 00:26 11/12/2001, you wrote: > > >Hi there, > > > > > >I observed something weird a couple of minutes ago. There's > something> that doesnt work correctly with the bans: > > > > > >look what happens if I type this on an empty or full channelm > with or > > without bans on it: > > >/mode #uhuh +bbbb <mailto:*!~test@test>*!~test@test > > <mailto:*!~2test2@2test>*!~2test2@2test > > <mailto:*!~3test3@3test>*!~3test3@3test *!~*@* > > >[18:12] *** Hidden sets mode: -bbb > > <mailto:*!~3test3@3test>*!~3test3@3test > > <mailto:*!~2test2@2test>*!~2test2@2test > <mailto:*!~test@test>*!~test@test> >[18:12] *** Hidden sets mode: > +bbbb <mailto:*!~test@test>*!~test@test > > <mailto:*!~2test2@2test>*!~2test2@2test > > <mailto:*!~3test3@3test>*!~3test3@3test *!~*@* > > >this is not really what its suppose to do/show, it says it > added 4 bans, > > but the banlist is: > > >#uhuh *!~*@* set by Hidden (Mon Dec 10 18:12:24) > > >#uhuh End of Channel Ban List > > > > > >I just thought I should let the coders know :) > > > > > > >Hello > >you remember that 'trick' to clean a banlist ? > > > >/mode #channel +b-b *!*@* *!*@* ? > > > >i think what you found as a bug here is just a "feature" that if > you put a > >ban on > > > >*!*@1.2.3.*, > >*!*@1.2.4.*, > >*!*@1.2.5.*... > >then put one on *!*@1.2.* .. it will just remove the others already > >covered by this new one > >to save space in banlist. > > > >So .. the *!~*@* covered the other 3 bans, so imho .. i dont see > a bug > >anywhere here. > > > >I hope this answered to your question ;) > > > >regards, > > > > > > > >Hidden > > ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >note: no need to cc the answer(s) to me, I'm already on the > list and > > dont wish to receive 2 same messages :) > > > > -------------------------------------- > --------- > > nighty - Undernet IRC Operator > > -------------------------------------- > --------- > > Paris.FR.EU.Undernet.Org > > -------------------------------------- > --------- > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >PGP key available at > >http://www.ecp-net.com/pgpkeys.php3?mail=nighty%40undernet.org > >FingerPrint : 40A8 D43E E4EB D04D D7AD A9AC 2392 A17F E57C C83E > > -------------------------------------- > --------- > >
