OK um. Received: (from undernet@localhost) by trek.sbg.org (8.12.1/8.12.1) id g3J3kIug028210 for coder-com-outgoing; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 20:46:18 -0700 Received: from buddha.quicksilver.co.nz (buddha.quicksilver.co.nz [202.89.130.1]) by trek.sbg.org (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g3J1H9wB024960 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 18:17:10 -0700
Judging by those headers, trek.sbg.org held onto this message for 2 and a half hours before forwarding it on? Whats going on? At 13:16 19/04/02 +1200, Mark Foster wrote: >Attacks? If you type /msg x verify <nick> it will say if youre logged in as >a given username. >What difference does it make? > >*sigh* > > >At 20:07 18/04/02 -0500, you wrote: >>Kindly remove the new "feature" that displays one's username in a /whois >>results. >>This is an open invitation to attacks and an invasion of privacy. I >>thought that >>security was supposed to be INCREASED not thrown wide open. Please think >>this one >>over again. No op I know is for this. >> >>Nemo288 >> >>@#windows2000pro @#networking @#windowsxp @#windows98 @#millennium >>@#Puternutz >> >>-- >> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>Just say no to one word solutions. >
