Was cause of me. Messages with "remove" in the body are set to bounce (spam-catcher). Unfortunately that's a lot of legit messages, so I'm thinking of removing that one.
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Mark Foster wrote: > OK um. > > Received: (from undernet@localhost) > by trek.sbg.org (8.12.1/8.12.1) id g3J3kIug028210 > for coder-com-outgoing; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 20:46:18 -0700 > Received: from buddha.quicksilver.co.nz (buddha.quicksilver.co.nz > [202.89.130.1]) > by trek.sbg.org (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g3J1H9wB024960 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 18:17:10 -0700 > > > > Judging by those headers, trek.sbg.org held onto this message for 2 and a > half hours before forwarding it on? > Whats going on? > > > At 13:16 19/04/02 +1200, Mark Foster wrote: > >Attacks? If you type /msg x verify <nick> it will say if youre logged in as > >a given username. > >What difference does it make? > > > >*sigh* > > > > > >At 20:07 18/04/02 -0500, you wrote: > >>Kindly remove the new "feature" that displays one's username in a /whois > >>results. > >>This is an open invitation to attacks and an invasion of privacy. I > >>thought that > >>security was supposed to be INCREASED not thrown wide open. Please think > >>this one > >>over again. No op I know is for this. > >> > >>Nemo288 > >> > >>@#windows2000pro @#networking @#windowsxp @#windows98 @#millennium > >>@#Puternutz > >> > >>-- > >> > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >>Just say no to one word solutions. > > > Stacy Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://pfft.net/stacy ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Famous last words: Nah, it's too easy that way. Do it like this.
