> Afaik servers aren't limited by the maxbanlist var (i've seen
> netrejoins
> cause a banlist of over 30 , x is a pseudoserver so ...)
>
> /gen
>
> > > If "we" think 40 will be enough for most channels, would it
> be possible to
> > have a higher limit for very large channels on a request
> basis? Let 40 be
> > the normal max and allow the limit to be raised only on
> channels that need
> > it. I may be wrong, but I doubt many channels will find a
> need to petition
> > for an exception. One thing though, is the 40 the combined
> channel ban +
> > Xban limit or is it 40 X bans + 40 channel bans?
> > stoney`
IIRC, X internally maintains a ban count, and also limits the bans to 40
or so. But indeed, if it wanted to, it could activate more bans, as the
server-side limit only applies to clients.
Kind regards
--
Tom Rons ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
(http://openircd.org/trons/)
