Thank you for your report, however, in future can you send bug reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'll get onto fixing this ASAP.Here's a log of the issue: ******************************* [01:27:29] * Parts: nate` ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [01:27:29] * Parts: nate` ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [01:27:29] * Parts: nate` ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [01:27:29] * Parts: nate` ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [01:27:29] * Parts: nate` ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [01:27:29] * Parts: nate` ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [01:27:29] * Parts: nate` ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [01:27:29] * Parts: nate` ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [01:27:29] * Parts: nate` ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [01:27:30] * Parts: nate` ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [01:27:30] * Parts: nate` ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [01:27:30] * Parts: nate` ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [01:27:30] * Parts: nate` ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [01:27:30] * Parts: nate` ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [01:27:30] * Parts: nate` ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
************************************
This PART-ONLY flood can be made this way: /part #chann,#chann,#chann, #chann,#chann,#chann#chann,#chann,#chann,#chann
Now here comes the reason I mail here: I have tested this command on 2 networks with hybrid Ircd and 2 networks with Ircu.
Guess what... this annoyance was only encountered in the Ircu networks,
INCLUDING Undernet.
I think this is a Ircu bug afterall. And I also think that it needs a patch.
Best wishes.
Florin wrote:
- [Coder-Com] ircu problem Ross Palmer
- Re: [Coder-Com] ircu problem Kev
- [Coder-Com] IRCU problem Florin
- Re: [Coder-Com] IRCU problem Perry Lorier
- Re: [Coder-Com] IRCU problem Ian Kumlien
- Re: [Coder-Com] IRCU problem Perry Lorier
- Re: [Coder-Com] IRCU problem Ian Kumlien
- Re: [Coder-Com] IRCU problem Chris Crowther