kddhhh23 commented on code in PR #67234: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/67234#discussion_r3275102624
########## airflow-core/src/airflow/ui/public/i18n/locales/ko/assets.json: ########## @@ -29,9 +29,9 @@ "group": "그룹", "lastAssetEvent": "마지막 에셋 이벤트", "name": "이름", - "producingTasks": "생성하는 태스크", + "producingTasks": "생성하는 작업", Review Comment: Thank you for the review! I looked into this a bit more and found that in `airflow-core/src/airflow/models/asset.py`, `TaskOutletAssetReference`, which corresponds to `producingTasks`, is described as “References from a task to an asset that it updates / produces.” `TaskInletAssetReference`, which corresponds to `consumingTasks`, is described as “References from a task to an asset that it references as an inlet.” Based on that, these labels seem to describe the relationship between an asset and tasks rather than an in-progress state. So I think translating `producingTasks` as “에셋 생성 태스크” and `consumingTasks` as “에셋 사용 태스크” would be clearer. Please let me know what you think. (“The term ‘태스크’ was chosen based on the comment below.”) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
