[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16268634#comment-16268634
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on BEAM-3008:
--------------------------------------
sduskis commented on issue #4171: [BEAM-3008] Extends API for BigtableIO Read
and Write by adding withInstanceId and withProjectId
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/4171#issuecomment-347502089
@chamikaramj This change looks good to me. The Jenkins failure seems to be
related to a completely different part of the Beam API. What do we need to do
to move this forward?
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
> BigtableIO should use ValueProviders
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: BEAM-3008
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3008
> Project: Beam
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: sdk-java-gcp
> Reporter: Solomon Duskis
> Assignee: Solomon Duskis
>
> [https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/2057] is an effort towards BigtableIO
> templatization. This Issue is a request to get a fully featured template for
> BigtableIO.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
