ddegan opened a new issue, #21253:
URL: https://github.com/apache/echarts/issues/21253

   ### Version
   
   5.6.0 
   
   ### Link to Minimal Reproduction
   
   https://codepen.io/ddegan/pen/myegeja?editors=0100
   
   ### Steps to Reproduce
   
   1. Open the provided link, hover on points, everything is ok
   2. Click the "Change visual map dimension" button. (this will setOptions 
changing the visualMap component)
   3 Hover one bubble and see that some values disappear (but if you hover then 
the point is shown)
   
   ### Current Behavior
   
   Lots of points are removed from the chart, while they are shown when 
hovered. 
   
   
   
   ### Expected Behavior
   
   All point should be present after changing the visual map options
   
   ### Environment
   
   ```markdown
   - OS: Window 11 pro
   - Browser: Chrome 140.0.7339.81
   - Framework: no framework
   ```
   
   ### Any additional comments?
   
   Don't know if it's related to https://github.com/apache/echarts/issues/20845 
but the behaviour is similar.
   Missing points are not visually obvious (no error message, no placeholder) 
unless you hover them.
   End users may never notice that some points are absent, which can lead to 
wrong conclusions or misinterpretation of the data.
   This impacts the reliability of scatter/bubble charts, especially in use 
cases like analytics dashboards or scientific data visualization, where every 
single point matters.
   
   Disabling progressive rendering is not an option for me since I'm dealing 
with big datasets that must be rendered progressively to smooth the UX.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to