hudi-agent commented on code in PR #18923:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/18923#discussion_r3854476418


##########
hudi-client/hudi-spark-client/src/main/scala/org/apache/hudi/SparkFileFormatInternalRowReaderContext.scala:
##########
@@ -96,29 +106,46 @@ class 
SparkFileFormatInternalRowReaderContext(baseFileReader: SparkColumnarFileR
     })
   }
 
-  // Aligns log-block records with the PushVariantIntoScan-projected variant 
shape before
-  // they reach the merger. Preserves merger metadata cols (_hoodie_record_key,
-  // _tmp_metadata_row_index) which the merger reads by ordinal — projecting 
down to the
-  // bare required schema would drop them and the merger would read garbage 
offsets.
-  override def getLogBlockRecordProjection(
-      dataBlockSchema: HoodieSchema): HOption[JFunction[InternalRow, 
InternalRow]] = {
-    val needsProjection = sparkRequiredSchema.exists(_.fields.exists(f => 
f.dataType match {
+  // True only when there is a Spark 4.1 PushVariantIntoScan projection to 
apply AND the table is
+  // not using a custom (payload-based) merger. Payload-based tables 
round-trip records through
+  // PayloadUpdateProcessor.convertToAvroRecord against a schema that still 
types variant fields as

Review Comment:
   🤖 nit: in Scala, a parameterless `def` (no `()`) signals a pure, 
referentially-transparent property by convention. Since this calls 
`getRecordMerger()` — which returns `null` before `setRecordMerger()` runs — it 
has observable state-dependence; could you add empty parens (`def 
shouldProjectVariants(): Boolean`) to signal callers that this isn't a simple 
accessor?
   
   <sub><i>⚠️ AI-generated; verify before applying. React 👍/👎 to flag 
quality.</i></sub>



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to