etseidl commented on code in PR #189:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-site/pull/189#discussion_r3470690244
##########
data/implementations/features/logical-types.yaml:
##########
@@ -2,81 +2,178 @@ category_id: logical-types
features:
- id: logical-string
display_name: STRING
-
+ version_display_name: STRING (BYTE_ARRAY)
+ compatibility: forward_compatible
+ released_in: 1.0.0
+ feature_url:
https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/blob/master/LogicalTypes.md#string
+ source_url:
https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/tree/parquet-format-1.0.0
- id: logical-enum
display_name: ENUM
-
+ version_display_name: ENUM (BYTE_ARRAY)
+ compatibility: forward_compatible
+ released_in: 2.0.0
+ feature_url:
https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/blob/master/LogicalTypes.md#enum
+ source_url:
https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/compare/parquet-format-1.0.0...parquet-format-2.0.0
- id: logical-uuid
display_name: UUID
-
+ version_display_name: UUID (FIXED_LEN_BYTE_ARRAY(16))
+ compatibility: forward_compatible
+ released_in: 2.6.0
+ feature_url:
https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/blob/master/LogicalTypes.md#uuid
+ source_url:
https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/compare/apache-parquet-format-2.5.0...apache-parquet-format-2.6.0
- id: logical-int-types
display_name: 8, 16, 32, 64 bit signed and unsigned INT
-
+ version_display_name: Signed and unsigned integer logical types (INT32,
INT64)
+ compatibility: forward_compatible
Review Comment:
I think we've agreed that new logical types are forward compatible.
> New logical types are considered forward compatible despite the loss of
semantic meaning.
https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#compatibility-and-feature-enablement
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
