emkornfield commented on PR #189: URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-site/pull/189#issuecomment-4812262300
> Figure out what to do with the features that are in parquet-format but don't have entry on implementation status: https://github.com/apache/parquet-site/pull/189/changes#r3470611445 Honestly I think most of these are so old, that it doesn't necessary add value, other then maybe providing a note on that page? Is there anything worth surfacing? > @emkornfield 's comment in https://github.com/apache/parquet-site/pull/189/changes#r3470700287 about what actually constitutes "forward compatible" -- I think this is a larger consensus building exercise so I would like to not address it in this PR Yeah, I have a feeling this might come up in the context of versioning conversations no need to block. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
