agavra commented on code in PR #9773:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/9773#discussion_r1022135489


##########
pinot-query-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/query/runtime/operator/MailboxSendOperator.java:
##########
@@ -49,57 +47,67 @@
  */
 public class MailboxSendOperator extends BaseOperator<TransferableBlock> {
   private static final Logger LOGGER = 
LoggerFactory.getLogger(MailboxSendOperator.class);
+
   private static final String EXPLAIN_NAME = "MAILBOX_SEND";
   private static final Set<RelDistribution.Type> SUPPORTED_EXCHANGE_TYPE =
       ImmutableSet.of(RelDistribution.Type.SINGLETON, 
RelDistribution.Type.RANDOM_DISTRIBUTED,
           RelDistribution.Type.BROADCAST_DISTRIBUTED, 
RelDistribution.Type.HASH_DISTRIBUTED);
-  private static final Random RANDOM = new Random();
-  // TODO: Deduct this value via grpc config maximum byte size; and make it 
configurable with override.
-  // TODO: Max block size is a soft limit. only counts fixedSize datatable 
byte buffer
-  private static final int MAX_MAILBOX_CONTENT_SIZE_BYTES = 4 * 1024 * 1024;
-
-  private final List<ServerInstance> _receivingStageInstances;
-  private final RelDistribution.Type _exchangeType;
-  private final KeySelector<Object[], Object[]> _keySelector;
-  private final String _serverHostName;
-  private final int _serverPort;
-  private final long _jobId;
-  private final int _stageId;
-  private final MailboxService<TransferableBlock> _mailboxService;
-  private final DataSchema _dataSchema;
-  private final boolean _isLeafStageSender;
-  private Operator<TransferableBlock> _dataTableBlockBaseOperator;
-
-  public MailboxSendOperator(MailboxService<TransferableBlock> mailboxService, 
DataSchema dataSchema,
+
+  private final Operator<TransferableBlock> _dataTableBlockBaseOperator;
+  private final BlockExchange _exchange;
+
+  @VisibleForTesting
+  interface BlockExchangeFactory {
+    BlockExchange build(MailboxService<TransferableBlock> mailboxService, 
List<MailboxIdentifier> destinations,
+        RelDistribution.Type exchange, KeySelector<Object[], Object[]> 
selector, BlockSplitter splitter);
+  }
+
+  @VisibleForTesting
+  interface MailboxIdGenerator {
+    MailboxIdentifier generate(ServerInstance server);
+  }
+
+  public MailboxSendOperator(MailboxService<TransferableBlock> mailboxService,
       Operator<TransferableBlock> dataTableBlockBaseOperator, 
List<ServerInstance> receivingStageInstances,
       RelDistribution.Type exchangeType, KeySelector<Object[], Object[]> 
keySelector, String hostName, int port,
       long jobId, int stageId, boolean isLeafStageSender) {
-    _dataSchema = dataSchema;
-    _mailboxService = mailboxService;
+    this(mailboxService, dataTableBlockBaseOperator, receivingStageInstances, 
exchangeType, keySelector,
+        isLeafStageSender, server -> toMailboxId(server, jobId, stageId, 
hostName, port), BlockExchange::getExchange);
+  }
+
+  @VisibleForTesting
+  MailboxSendOperator(MailboxService<TransferableBlock> mailboxService,
+      Operator<TransferableBlock> dataTableBlockBaseOperator, 
List<ServerInstance> receivingStageInstances,
+      RelDistribution.Type exchangeType, KeySelector<Object[], Object[]> 
keySelector,
+      boolean isLeafStageSender, MailboxIdGenerator mailboxIdGenerator, 
BlockExchangeFactory blockExchangeFactory) {
     _dataTableBlockBaseOperator = dataTableBlockBaseOperator;
-    _exchangeType = exchangeType;
-    if (_exchangeType == RelDistribution.Type.SINGLETON) {
+
+    List<MailboxIdentifier> receivingMailboxes;
+    if (exchangeType == RelDistribution.Type.SINGLETON) {
+      // TODO: this logic should be moved into SingletonExchange

Review Comment:
   I did create a `SingletonExchange` - this piece of code was confusing to me 
though... I wasn't really sure what it was doing and I didn't want to mess with 
it since there's no existing code coverage. Basically I was trying to 
understand why we're even iterating at all throughout the server instances 
instead of just throwing an exception if there's more than one?



##########
pinot-query-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/query/runtime/operator/MailboxSendOperator.java:
##########
@@ -49,57 +47,67 @@
  */
 public class MailboxSendOperator extends BaseOperator<TransferableBlock> {
   private static final Logger LOGGER = 
LoggerFactory.getLogger(MailboxSendOperator.class);
+
   private static final String EXPLAIN_NAME = "MAILBOX_SEND";
   private static final Set<RelDistribution.Type> SUPPORTED_EXCHANGE_TYPE =
       ImmutableSet.of(RelDistribution.Type.SINGLETON, 
RelDistribution.Type.RANDOM_DISTRIBUTED,
           RelDistribution.Type.BROADCAST_DISTRIBUTED, 
RelDistribution.Type.HASH_DISTRIBUTED);
-  private static final Random RANDOM = new Random();
-  // TODO: Deduct this value via grpc config maximum byte size; and make it 
configurable with override.
-  // TODO: Max block size is a soft limit. only counts fixedSize datatable 
byte buffer
-  private static final int MAX_MAILBOX_CONTENT_SIZE_BYTES = 4 * 1024 * 1024;
-
-  private final List<ServerInstance> _receivingStageInstances;
-  private final RelDistribution.Type _exchangeType;
-  private final KeySelector<Object[], Object[]> _keySelector;
-  private final String _serverHostName;
-  private final int _serverPort;
-  private final long _jobId;
-  private final int _stageId;
-  private final MailboxService<TransferableBlock> _mailboxService;
-  private final DataSchema _dataSchema;
-  private final boolean _isLeafStageSender;
-  private Operator<TransferableBlock> _dataTableBlockBaseOperator;
-
-  public MailboxSendOperator(MailboxService<TransferableBlock> mailboxService, 
DataSchema dataSchema,
+
+  private final Operator<TransferableBlock> _dataTableBlockBaseOperator;
+  private final BlockExchange _exchange;
+
+  @VisibleForTesting
+  interface BlockExchangeFactory {
+    BlockExchange build(MailboxService<TransferableBlock> mailboxService, 
List<MailboxIdentifier> destinations,
+        RelDistribution.Type exchange, KeySelector<Object[], Object[]> 
selector, BlockSplitter splitter);
+  }
+
+  @VisibleForTesting
+  interface MailboxIdGenerator {
+    MailboxIdentifier generate(ServerInstance server);
+  }
+
+  public MailboxSendOperator(MailboxService<TransferableBlock> mailboxService,
       Operator<TransferableBlock> dataTableBlockBaseOperator, 
List<ServerInstance> receivingStageInstances,
       RelDistribution.Type exchangeType, KeySelector<Object[], Object[]> 
keySelector, String hostName, int port,
       long jobId, int stageId, boolean isLeafStageSender) {
-    _dataSchema = dataSchema;
-    _mailboxService = mailboxService;
+    this(mailboxService, dataTableBlockBaseOperator, receivingStageInstances, 
exchangeType, keySelector,
+        isLeafStageSender, server -> toMailboxId(server, jobId, stageId, 
hostName, port), BlockExchange::getExchange);
+  }
+
+  @VisibleForTesting
+  MailboxSendOperator(MailboxService<TransferableBlock> mailboxService,
+      Operator<TransferableBlock> dataTableBlockBaseOperator, 
List<ServerInstance> receivingStageInstances,
+      RelDistribution.Type exchangeType, KeySelector<Object[], Object[]> 
keySelector,
+      boolean isLeafStageSender, MailboxIdGenerator mailboxIdGenerator, 
BlockExchangeFactory blockExchangeFactory) {
     _dataTableBlockBaseOperator = dataTableBlockBaseOperator;
-    _exchangeType = exchangeType;
-    if (_exchangeType == RelDistribution.Type.SINGLETON) {
+
+    List<MailboxIdentifier> receivingMailboxes;
+    if (exchangeType == RelDistribution.Type.SINGLETON) {
+      // TODO: this logic should be moved into SingletonExchange
       ServerInstance singletonInstance = null;
       for (ServerInstance serverInstance : receivingStageInstances) {
-        if (serverInstance.getHostname().equals(_mailboxService.getHostname())
-            && serverInstance.getQueryMailboxPort() == 
_mailboxService.getMailboxPort()) {
+        if (serverInstance.getHostname().equals(mailboxService.getHostname())
+            && serverInstance.getQueryMailboxPort() == 
mailboxService.getMailboxPort()) {
           Preconditions.checkState(singletonInstance == null, "multiple 
instance found for singleton exchange type!");
           singletonInstance = serverInstance;
         }
       }
       Preconditions.checkNotNull(singletonInstance, "Unable to find receiving 
instance for singleton exchange");
-      _receivingStageInstances = Collections.singletonList(singletonInstance);
+      receivingMailboxes = 
Collections.singletonList(mailboxIdGenerator.generate(singletonInstance));
     } else {
-      _receivingStageInstances = receivingStageInstances;
+      receivingMailboxes = receivingStageInstances
+          .stream()
+          .map(mailboxIdGenerator::generate)
+          .collect(Collectors.toList());
     }
-    _keySelector = keySelector;
-    _serverHostName = hostName;
-    _serverPort = port;
-    _jobId = jobId;
-    _stageId = stageId;
-    Preconditions.checkState(SUPPORTED_EXCHANGE_TYPE.contains(_exchangeType),
-        String.format("Exchange type '%s' is not supported yet", 
_exchangeType));
-    _isLeafStageSender = isLeafStageSender;
+
+    BlockSplitter splitter = (block, type, size)
+        -> TransferableBlockUtils.splitBlock(block, type, size, 
isLeafStageSender);
+    _exchange = blockExchangeFactory.build(mailboxService, receivingMailboxes, 
exchangeType, keySelector, splitter);
+
+    Preconditions.checkState(SUPPORTED_EXCHANGE_TYPE.contains(exchangeType),
+        String.format("Exchange type '%s' is not supported yet", 
exchangeType));

Review Comment:
   no good reason, this is just what it was before my refactor. I'll change 
that.



##########
pinot-query-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/query/runtime/blocks/BlockSplitter.java:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+ * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+ * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+ * KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+ * specific language governing permissions and limitations
+ * under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.pinot.query.runtime.blocks;
+
+import java.util.Iterator;
+import org.apache.pinot.common.datablock.BaseDataBlock;
+
+
+/**
+ * Interface for splitting transferable blocks. This is used for ensuring
+ * that the blocks that are sent along the wire play nicely with the
+ * underlying transport.
+ */
+public interface BlockSplitter {

Review Comment:
   > seems like we can also make this an inner interface in BlockExchange.java?
   
   Yeah we can do that, I left it outside because I thought there might 
actually be some pretty good reasons to have multiple types of block splitters 
(e.g. for columnar once we support that).
   
   > any chance we will use this other than test purpose?
   
   It already is - `MailboxSendOperator` already uses it to abstract away the 
difference between `isLeafStageSedner` and not. See:
   ```
       BlockSplitter splitter = (block, type, size)
            -> TransferableBlockUtils.splitBlock(block, type, size, 
isLeafStageSender);
        _exchange = blockExchangeFactory.build(mailboxService, 
receivingMailboxes, exchangeType, keySelector, splitter);
   ```



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@pinot.apache.org

Reply via email to