DanielLeens commented on issue #11007:
URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/issues/11007#issuecomment-5509300655

   Thanks, @hyoj-dev and @yigitcan-ozturk. I checked current dev and the open 
PR set: connector-aerospike and connector-qdrant both already have OptionRule 
surfaces, and there is no active connector-specific OptionRule migration PR for 
either. Before this becomes a code claim, please each post the exact remaining 
imperative validation you find and why it is deterministic enough for 
OptionRule or Conditions. Keep one connector per PR, preserve broker, network, 
server, and data-dependent checks at runtime, and add focused valid and invalid 
factory validation tests. A no-change audit is the correct outcome if the 
existing rules already cover the contract; please do not create a migration PR 
solely to claim the tracker.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to