[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17611734#comment-17611734
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on WICKET-6999:
----------------------------------------
dstoch commented on PR #540:
URL: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/540#issuecomment-1263950659
> @dstoch the actual _application_ bundle would need to do that as they
require. Further backing evidence is the Wicket 8.x bundles do not have
'DynamicImport-Package: *' specified.
MANIFESTs are broken since Wicket 8.x, so it is not a good evidence ;).
> Missing Export-Package of packages with "internal" in name
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WICKET-6999
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6999
> Project: Wicket
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: wicket
> Affects Versions: 8.14.0, 9.11.0
> Reporter: Daniel Stoch
> Priority: Major
>
> Some packages in Wicket have "internal" word in its name, eg.:
> org.apache.wicket.markup.html.internal
> But they are a part of public API (eg. HtmlHeaderContainer). These packages
> should be exported in MANIFEST.MF file in Export-Package section as in Wicket
> 6.x/7.x.
> I think something was broken in MANIFEST.MF generation, maybe some generator
> plugin (org.apache.felix.maven-bundle-plugin) configuration or version
> change? Packages with "internal" can be by default excluded from
> Export-Package section. But it is not a case in Wicket library.
> Here is excerpt from "Apache Felix Maven Bundle Plugin" documentation:
> {quote}
> <Export-Package> is now assumed to be the set of packages in your local Java
> sources, excluding the default package '.' and any packages containing 'impl'
> or 'internal'. (before version 2 of the bundleplugin it was based on the
> symbolic name)
> {quote}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
