steveloughran commented on PR #5315: URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/5315#issuecomment-1408635376
so those production classes I am worrying about are already explicitly requiring log4j on the CP? OK, that's not as bad as I feared...I was worrying that the code was going from commons-logging wrappers of logj to raw log4j, which is a problem -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
