Hello.
Did you try following the tutorial in 
http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/C++WordCount ?

We use C++ pipes in production on a large cluster, and it works.

--gianluigi


On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 13:28 -0700, Keith Wiley wrote:
> No responses yet, although I admit it's only been a few hours.
> 
> As a follow-up, permit me to pose the following question:
> 
> Is it, in fact, impossible to run C++ pipes on a fully-distributed system (as 
> opposed to a pseudo-distributed system)?  I haven't found any definitive 
> clarification on this topic one way or the other.  The only statement that I 
> found in the least bit illuminating is in the O'Reilly book (not official 
> Hadoop documentation mind you), p.38, which states:
> 
> "To run a Pipes job, we need to run Hadoop in pseudo-distributed mode...Pipes 
> doesn't run in standalone (local) mode, since it relies on Hadoop's 
> distributed cache mechanism, which works only when HDFS is running."
> 
> The phrasing of those statements is a little unclear in that the distinction 
> being made appears to be between standalone and pseudo-distributed mode, 
> without any specific reference to fully-distributed mode.  Namely, the 
> section that qualifies the need for pseudo-distributed mode (the need for 
> HDFS) would obviously also apply to full distributed mode despite the lack of 
> mention of fully distributed mode in the quoted section.  So can pipes run in 
> fully distributed mode or not?
> 
> Bottom line, I can't get C++ pipes to work on a fully distributed cluster yet 
> and I don't know if I am wasting my time, if this is a truly impossible 
> effort or if it can be done and I simply haven't figured out how to do it yet.
> 
> Thanks for any help.
> 
> ________________________________________________________________________________
> Keith Wiley               kwi...@keithwiley.com               
> www.keithwiley.com
> 
> "The easy confidence with which I know another man's religion is folly teaches
> me to suspect that my own is also."
>   -- Mark Twain
> ________________________________________________________________________________
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to