robert burrell donkin wrote: > +0 > > i'd prefer requiring 3/4 of the votes cast to override a veto but i'm not > willing to veto the proposal since i think that it'll be an improvement on > the current situation. > > i'd like to think that we'll be able to reach consensus most times. i'd > also prefer some sort of extended time limit to receive votes on a project > submission so that we can at least try to resolve issues (which is what a > committer veto represents) before the project goes into the commons. > > - robert
My feeling is that we should try and create as few new wheels as possible. The language in Martin's proposal is straight from the Jakarta guidelines for approving a release. So, I'd say if this type of vote is good enough for release code from a subproject, it should be good enough to accept code into the Commons. -Ted. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
