> > We can always fond out a mechanism to kick out abandoned projects too. > > =:o/ I'd prefer to see it demoted to sandboxes. But that could just create messy sandboxes. I'm +1 on the voting system change. I'd assumed it was that way already actually :) The current rule 17 seems difficult just in terms of figuring out the current active committers. I'm finding out how hard it can be sometimes to keep focused on fixing and adding to code while work and life try to interfere. Out of interest, which three of y'all are the general oversighting committers? Bay -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- RE: [PROPOSAL] Update to Commons package approval gu... Vincent Massol
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Update to Commons package approval gu... Morgan Delagrange
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Update to Commons package approv... Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Update to Commons package approval gu... Ted Husted
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Update to Commons package approval gu... robert burrell donkin
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Update to Commons package approv... Ted Husted
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Update to Commons package ap... robert burrell donkin
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Update to Commons packag... Geir Magnusson Jr.
- RE: [PROPOSAL] Update to Commons pa... Paulo Gaspar
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Update to Commo... robert burrell donkin
- [DIGESTER] Less ambiguous ... bayard
- [DIGESTER] Less ambiguous ... Janek Bogucki
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Update to Commons package approval gu... Paul Hammant
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Update to Commons package approval gu... Jeff Turner
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Update to Commons package approval gu... Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Update to Commons package approval gu... Martin Cooper
- RE: [PROPOSAL] Update to Commons package approval gu... Scott Sanders
- RE: [PROPOSAL] Update to Commons package approval gu... Scott Sanders