It might be a bit clearer to continue with the "set parent" phrase instead of shortening to 'parent'. ie
Construct a "set parent" rule with the specified method name. The "set parent" method's argument type is assumed to be the class of the child object. This makes it clear we are talking about a method of a 'child' and not a method of the 'parent'. Also should the argument type really be the type of the child? If it's a "setParent" method then the argument type should be the the type of the parent. My 0.02 Euros worth, -Janek Original -------- SetTopRule public SetTopRule(Digester digester, java.lang.String methodName) Construct a "set parent" rule with the specified method name. The parent method's argument type is assumed to be the class of the child object. Parameters: digester - The associated Digester methodName - Method name of the parent method to call http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/digester/commons-digester-1.1.1/docs/api/o rg/apache/commons/digester/SetTopRule.html -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>