On Sat, 2 Feb 2002 08:55, Scott Sanders wrote: > > Explain that then from the perspective of Peter's action. > > Which part of the code was talking? > > He voted -1 on a release. He stated his viewpoint. Does that stop the > release, maybe.
If it did I prolly wouldn't have done it - I get enough hate mail as it stands ;) > He has the right though, as a commons committer to do > that. The code in logging can be directly and indirectly tied to his > work. Or not tied to my work at all and I may just want to annoy the crapo out of someone ;) > The code talking is the patch I am waiting for from him to fix the > problem... What problem? -- Cheers, Pete *------------------------------------------------* | The student who is never required to do what | | he cannot do never does what he can do. | | - John Stuart Mill | *------------------------------------------------* -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
