On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Michael A. Smith wrote: > "It is permitted, but strongly discouraged as a matter of style, to > redundantly specify the public modifier for interface methods." It sounds like something that the Java Code Conventions document should be stressing too. Maybe send a comment to Scott Hommel [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] (listed in the code conventions). I seem to recall that the Avalon project has its own coding standard, is this something they address? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Re: [collections][patch] Remove redundant public modifi... Morgan Delagrange
- [collections] Some source files contain bad line-e... Christopher Elkins
- Re: [collections] Some source files contain ba... Morgan Delagrange
- Re: [collections] Some source files contai... James Strachan
- Re: [collections] Some source files co... James Strachan
- Re: [collections][patch] Remove redundant public m... Henri Yandell
- Re: [collections][patch] Remove redundant public m... Daniel Rall
- Re: [collections][patch] Remove redundant public modifi... Christopher Elkins
- Re: [collections][patch] Remove redundant public m... Michael A. Smith
- Re: [collections][patch] Remove redundant publ... Michael A. Smith
- Re: [collections][patch] Remove redundant publ... Henri Yandell
- Re: [collections][patch] Remove redundant public m... Daniel Rall
- Re: [collections][patch] Remove redundant public modifi... Daniel Rall