----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael A. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Morgan Delagrange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 4:18 PM Subject: Re: [Collections] [Vote] Release Collections 2.0 redux
> On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Morgan Delagrange wrote: > > I'd like to release Collections 2.0 now. Any takers? The release package > > is here: > > There doesn't seem to be a copy of the LICENSE in the source distribution > (there is in the binary dist). Should there be? That's a good point. The current directions for preparing source distributions don't capture the LICENSE file, I think. The current directions don't capture anything below the component directory. (The last Collections release didn't have the license either.) I agree that including the LICENSE is a good idea. > Also, in the commons-collections.jar file, the LICENSE is not included in > the META-INF directory. Also a good point. > I seem to remember some talk on this list that > the binary jar should include the LICENSE as well. Too bad the discussor(s) didn't update the build script. :) Hmm, I'm tempted to add the LICENSE manually, but I don't want to contaminate the package with my targz ineptitude. Maybe we should just put inclusion of the LICENSE file on our post-mortem to-do list for the next release. - Morgan _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
