Gier is correct.  In the end jjar gets jars.  Maven is an entire build
methodology. JJAR is a tool, with no meaning unless used in a larger
context.

Maven could be a consumer of JJAR's work.

Scott (Waiting for those jjar commits ;-)



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 2:19 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [JJAR] Status? Jar Repository?
> 
> 
> On 4/16/02 5:18 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 
> 17/04/2002 12:08:06 
> > AM:
> > 
> >> 
> >> I think we're working towards having a real problem towards the 
> >> consumer as to the difference between Maven and Jjar and why there 
> >> are two tools with such an overlap.
> >> 
> >> I'd recently flipped my 'consumer' demands over to Maven. 
> Do you see 
> >> any forseeable solutions?
> > Choice.
> > 
> > At the moment Maven is a lot wider scope than JJar, and a lot more 
> > mature.
> > 
> 
> That's like saying Tomcat is a lot wider scope than Ant and a 
> lot more mature. :)
> 
> My point is that we are comparing apples to oranges - they 
> aren't intended to solve the same problem.  Yes, Maven needs 
> to know about dependencies and have jars to satisfy the 
> dependencies, but so does a classloader...
> 
> Here's a limited list of what maven does, and given the 
> development frenzy surrounding it, I can say this is accurate 
> only as of 17:18EST 20020416 :
> 
> *    Change log document created directly from repository information.
> *    Cross referenced sources
> *    Source metrics
> *    Mailing lists
> *    Developer list
> *    Dependency list
> *    Unit test reports including coverage
> *    Article Collection
> *    Software Development References
> *    Software Development Process Documentation
> *    Distribution publication based on the POM.
> 
> JJAR gets jars and dependency jars.  That's it.
> 
> -- 
> Geir Magnusson Jr.                                     
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> System and Software Consulting
> 
> The cost of synchronization is much less that the cost of stupidity.
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> <mailto:commons-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For 
> additional commands, 
> e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to