From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > "Scott Sanders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 17/04/2002 07:32:44 AM: > > > Gier is correct. In the end jjar gets jars. Maven is an entire build > > methodology. JJAR is a tool, with no meaning unless used in a larger > > context. > > Thanks for clearing that up. I was really confused :-) I was just about to > check out the build process in JJar.... > > > > > Maven could be a consumer of JJAR's work. > And vice versa. JJar could use Maven to get it going faster....
Agreed. Maybe JJAR could suck out the dependency information from Maven project.xml files? James _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
