On 4/17/02 6:23 PM, "James Strachan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> "Scott Sanders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 17/04/2002 07:32:44 AM:
>>
>>> Gier is correct. In the end jjar gets jars. Maven is an entire build
>>> methodology. JJAR is a tool, with no meaning unless used in a larger
>>> context.
>>
>> Thanks for clearing that up. I was really confused :-) I was just about to
>> check out the build process in JJar....
>>
>>>
>>> Maven could be a consumer of JJAR's work.
>> And vice versa. JJar could use Maven to get it going faster....
>
> Agreed. Maybe JJAR could suck out the dependency information from Maven
> project.xml files?
That's possible - it could be an alternate repository that's supported to
allow a mavenized project to just have one dependency declaration...
--
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
System and Software Consulting
"The greatest pleasure in life is doing what people say you cannot do."
- Walter Bagehot
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
