--- Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Morgan Delagrange wrote: > > > > Quite right, your proposal did say "all > committers". > > Sounds like we're essentially arguing about > nothing. > > I'm saying that all committers should keep an eye > on > > commits. You're saying that the PMC should > monitor > > all commits, but that the PMC should be all the > > committers. Fine. > > > > I'm not sure what is gained by waving a wand over > the > > committers and naming them an unofficial PMC, but > I > > agree that we need to be responsible for commits. > > You're right - we're arguing about nothing. It's > just a > naming/terminology issue - to make things more in > line > with what other expect things to be called. > > But I think there's something more - if we can use > it to > better organise and keep track of who's active, on > what and what other components is he interested in. > Right now we kind of use STATUS, but it doesn't > reflect who's active or who's monitoring what. > > I think we should wait for things to at jakarta > level > to settle down, and then reopen the issue. > > -- > Costin >
Works for me. - Morgan ===== Morgan Delagrange http://jakarta.apache.org/taglibs http://jakarta.apache.org/commons http://axion.tigris.org http://jakarta.apache.org/watchdog __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
