Berin > Victor Volle wrote: > >>Just wanted to clarify the naming: what you call Attributes are not the > >>same > >>as what Berin calls Attributes. Your Attributes are like my Fields. > > > > > > Yes, I think so. Imagine a class "Foo" with an instance variable > > "bar". In the MetaModel the MetaClass Foo would have an > > (Meta)Attribute that has the name "bar". This "bar" can have > > properties/extensions/attributes. > > > > What do you prefer? > > Be clear in your definitions.
I thought I was :-( (sorry, I am no native speaker) > Attributes have a name and parameters. They are not representing anything > concrete in the class already. Sorry, I do not get it. I really think that we might mean different things by the name of "attribute". Can your "attributes" be attributes of Classes only and represent instance variables? Or: Are your "attributes" attributes of any MetaModelElement like Classes, Methods/Operations and Attributes/Fields. Then your "attribute" is something like C# attributes? Adding some semantics to a model element. And you would call my "attribute" a "field"? Victor -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
