[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
from: Victor Volle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
1. I do not like the name MetaBean, I would prefer Clazz or
MetaClass, because "Bean" implies that I have to have
getters and setters. I know that this is an important use
case, but sometimes I am only interested in the
operations (interfaces etc.).
I do not like the name MetaProperty for the same reason.
I would prefer Field (Berin) or Attribute (UML).
To be honest, I'm not sure that 'bean' implies very much these days. After all, EJBs are hardly beans in the traditional sense.
That is true. EJBs are components, with the entity beans modeled
after the JavaBean idiom (default constructor, getter/setter, etc.).
JavaBeans are objects.
--
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
