> On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > For beans, the solution was to call it beanutil, so perhaps we should > > call it jdbcutil. > > > > Looking at the Sun website, the JDBC acronym is clearly trademarked on its > webpage so we need another name. > > I'll ask the question on General as do we even know if jdbcutil is ok? > [Beans isn't trademarked, JavaBeans is].
Looking at it, and thinking in the usual stop-start way, we have a jdbc2pool project, so assuming that is okay, then jdbcutils is okay [to match beanutils]. Hen -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
