Not too bothered. With my current 'release' hat on all I care about is
whether it's big enough to hold up 1.0.1 or not :)

It sounds like it's a design bug rather than an implementation bug, and
design bugs take unknown amounts of time to fix. So I'd like to go to
1.0.1 without it and leave a fix for it until 1.1.

How does that sound?

Hen

On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, Stephen Colebourne wrote:

> The original bug comes from a mis-thinking of the compareTo API being
> implemented. CompareTo throws NPE if the object passed in is null, but thats
> totally different to what the builder should do.
>
> However, I'd like to get it fixed properly, and in a quick look a few days
> ago it was going to require a bit of thought ;-) So I didn't fix it. If we
> want it, I can take a look again.
>
> Stephen
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 8:36 PM
> Subject: [lang] Another bugfix? Re: [lang] Release 1.0.1 test cut
>
>
> >
> > Anyone care to comment on the following bug:
> >
> > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14306
> >
> > and whether it should go in 1.0.1 release?
> >
> > Hen
> >
> > On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Henri Yandell wrote:
> >
> > > I've cut a test of the 1.0.1 release files. They're at:
> > >
> > > http://www.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-1.0.1/
> > >
> > > This is a proposed bugfix release and it fixes the following bugs:
> > >
> > > #14062:     StringUtils.split fails to handle (String, null, int)
> correctly.
> > >             This results in the String "null" appearing in the split
> text, when
> > >             the text is not entirely consumed in the split, ie) int is
> less
> > >             than the number of whitespace tokens in the String.
> > >             Fix is courtesy of Mark McDowell.
> > >
> > > #-    :     SystemUtils.isJavaVersionAtLeast made static.
> > >
> > > #-    :     NumberUtils test fails in JDK 1.2 due to lack of 1.2 support
> for
> > >             "1.1E-700F". Fix is to use SystemUtils to protect it for the
> moment.
> > >
> > > #-    :     ToStringStyle did not compile under JDK 1.2 due to inner
> class
> > >             issues. Added explicit 'this.' prefixes to make this so.
> > >
> > > #14566:     NumberRange.getMaximum was returning the minimum.
> > >             Bug reported by Kasper Ronning.
> > >
> > > #13527:     ExceptionUtils now handles getCausedByException and
> getRootCause
> > >             from EJBException and ServletException, as reported by Lars
> > >             Beuster.
> > > #14334:     NestableDelegate now implements Serializable, as reported by
> > >             Max Rydahl Andersen.
> > >
> > > #13568:     Enums cannot now be created with the same name as an already
> > >             existing Enum. Enum now compiles under JDK 1.2.
> > >
> > >
> > > Does anyone see anything wrong? Are there any bugs outstanding that
> should
> > > go in this release?
> > >
> > > Hen
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to