Morgan Delagrange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 18/01/2003 05:59:33 PM:
> > --- James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > "James Strachan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote on 18/01/2003 05:30:03 > > > PM: > > > > > > > Actually having said that - the dependencies > > that we want to inherit in > > > each > > > > jelly-tags build are different to the main Jelly > > project.xml. I guess we > > > > could have a parent jelly-tags/project.xml which > > is just used to share > > > > dependencies across each child build? > > > > > > We already do. It's in jelly-tags/tag-project.xml. > > > > DOH. Yes of course. Sorry, I've still not woken up > > yet today. > > > > > That's where all the other stuff inherits from, > > like organisation, mailing > > > lists, developers, build etc > > > > Yes - so all we need is to be able to specify the > > dependencies we want to > > share in jelly-tags/tag-project.xml and have Maven > > inherit them in the child > > builds. > > > > Sorry for the confusion on what, it turns out, is a > > simple matter. > > > > James > > I like the entity approach though. It creates a > single place to update the principal Jelly > dependencies rather than two (jelly/project.xml and > jelly-tags/jelly-tags/tag-project.xml). Less room to > mess up or cheat. Is the script URL is not getting > passed to the reactor's SAX parser for some reason? Nope, it's being passed alright, but it relies on the 'parent directory', as it's prefixed with file:../ When the reactor runs, I don't believe it changes the current directory. -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog Work: http://www.multitask.com.au -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
