On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> Why not -- a search that includes a criteria for "beanutils" or > "[beanutils]" is going to be quite accurate, even on a busy list like > commons-dev. If you want to do folder-per-package, filtering on this in > the subject line works well to (because the community is pretty well > trained). Firstly, the mail archives with searchable functionalities seem to ignore the []'s. Secondly, io, lang, collection, util are quite vague. > > With lots of sub-lists, the user > > could search over each list or search over all of Commons. > > > > Do any mailing list archive sites offer cross-list searches in a single > request? If they don't, this is a total non-starter for me. I'd be suggesting that eyebrowse gain this functionality. > > > This is why we have filters and folders in our mail readers, IMHO. > > > > I obviously need to keep trying to migrate to mutt. > > > > Even pine does a pretty decent job at this :-). It's been unimpressing me recently. I should be able to hit 'D' on a thread and have it mean: "Delete this, and automatically delete all replies to this, ie) the whole thread if I 'D'elete the first entry". It'd be nice to have another delete that says ignore anything else from this IP or email. Hen -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
