On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 08:55, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > John Keyes wrote, On 06/02/2003 0.58: > > I have grown disgruntled with CLIs current design so I have done > > some thinking on the matter (BTW, I know I should have done > > this before a 1.0 release). Before I finish working on it > > I thought I'd seek comments from you guys. Check out the > > class diagram at http://www.integralsource.com/cli/datatype.gif > > and let me hear your comments. > > Just a note about CLI. > > Avalon has worked with Jakarta Commons so that we are able to move the > projects that now rely on Excalibur CLI to Commons CLI, so remember your > customers ;-) Yeah I know that, this is why I haven't produced any code yet. I am just throwing the idea out there. Any deliverable would have to be able to fully support the current feature set. I will continue with my design and see what people think when it is finished anyway.
> One point that we would like to see is that commons logging is never a > *hard* dependency. That means that if commons logging is not in the > classpath, the package should be able to work correctly, even if with > logging disabled. Where has this mention of commons-logging come from? I didn't mention anything to do with it. > Furthermore, there is a patch for a completely reflective version of > CLI. What's the status of that? The status is that I haven't gotten in and looked at it yet. I need to try to understand the patch and write the unit tests for it. -John K --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
